文章从时间副词“就”的两个句式“这就+v”和“就+v”及其相关表达的接受度入手，对其接受度进行对比研究，发现整体情况“这就+v”接受度高于“就+v”，但是也有例外情况，如：客家方言对“就+v”接受度更高。在地域（七大方言区）、是否学过现代汉语、语言学概论等相关知识的研修情况、年龄等方面显示出不同的接受度差异，这对与时间副词“就”相关的句法等提供了新的探讨，文章主要对这些差异产生的原因进行详尽的探讨，并对时间副词“就”在未来的接受度进行了简单的预测。

This paper starts with the two sentence patterns of "Jiu +v" and "Jiu +v" of time adverb "Jiu" and makes a comparative study on their acceptability. It is found that the acceptability of "Jiu +v" is higher than that of "Jiu +v" in the whole situation, but there are exceptions, such as: Hakka dialect has a higher acceptability of "Jiu +v".

Different acceptance differences are shown in areas (seven dialect areas), research status of modern Chinese, introduction to linguistics and other relevant knowledge, and age, etc. This paper provides a new discussion on the syntax related to the adverb of time "Jiu", etc. This paper mainly discusses the causes of these differences in detail. The acceptance degree of time adverb "just" in the future is simply predicted.