《新加坡调解公约》的颁布生效致使调解近年来得到国际社会的广泛关注。中国目前虽已签署公约，但司法确认作为中国商事调解协议的现行执行机制，其规则与公约在适用范围与审查方式等方面尚存在诸多差异。鉴于中国调解具有鲜明的司法驱动色彩，审查监管压力后置，国内调解既有执行机制具有一定的实践合理性，短期恐难适配公约的要求。因此，中国应首先采用“双轨制”的模式，针对国际商事调解构建独立的执行机制，待调解产业成熟后再考虑国内调解协议执行机制与国际的统合并轨。在这一过程中，可借助自贸区法院和中国国际商事法庭先行先试，推动调解的市场化改革，孕育现代调解理念。

In recent years, the Singapore Mediation Convention has brought mediation to the attention of the international community. Currently, China has signed the Convention. However, it is important to note that China's enforcement mechanism for commercial mediation agreements differs from the Convention in terms of scope of application and review methods. China's commercial mediation agreement enforcement mechanism is judicially driven with a focus on mediation supervision through judicial review, demonstrating practical rationality. Therefore, in the short term, it may be challenging for it to meet the requirements of the Convention. In this regard, China should first establish an independent enforcement mechanism for international commercial mediation. As China's mediation industry matures, further consideration should be given to aligning China's commercial mediation agreement implementation mechanism with international standards. This process could involve continued experimentation through Free Trade Zone courts and the China International Commercial Court; promoting market-oriented reform of mediation; and cultivating modern mediation values.