摘要/Abstract

楚辞传到日本后，一千多年来不同时代、不同学者的笔下都有着不同的屈原形象。奈良平安时代人们心目中忧君思国的屈原，镰仓、室町时代忠君爱国、苏世独立横而不流、狂狷景行、怀才不遇的屈原，江户末期和明治维新学者笔下富有民族气节、作为爱国志士的屈原。以及近代以来，随着文化的整合与融合被一些学者所否定的屈原。屈原形象的接受史既反映了接受者的个人心史，也折射出历史群体的政治及文化心态。

After Chu Ci was spread to Japan, there were different images of Qu Yuan in scholars’writings of different eras for more than a thousand years. During the Heian period of Nara, Qu Yuan was commonly considered to be concerned about his country. During Kamakura, the Muromachi period, he was viewed to be loyal. At the time of the Suzuki, he was regarded as independent and honest, but was unrecognized to show his talents. Through the late Edo period and the Meiji Restoration, Qu Yuan was seen as a patriot. And in recent times, with the integration of culture, the image of Qu Yuan has been denied among some scholars, The accepting of Qu Yuan's image reflects both the personal emotion of the recipient and the political and cultural mentality of the historical group.