摘要/Abstract

“诉讼时效”是罗马法发展到一定阶段才产生的概念，其客体的界定也经历了一个从诉权到实体权利的发展过程。根据诉讼时效适用范围的理论划分标准可以看出，将请求权作为诉讼时效的适用对象是最为合理的，而且目前也已在学界和立法界达成了共识。但是对于各种请求权的适用问题应当区别对待，具体分析。债权请求权应当纳入诉讼时效的适用范围。除损害赔偿请求权以外，其他人身权请求权均不宜适用诉讼时效。而且就我国目前的国情来看，物权请求权不适用诉讼时效也是利大于弊。

Limitation of action is created in Rome law era, the definition of its object is also experienced the process from the right of suit to substantive rights. According to the classification standard of the scope of application of limitation of action, we can see that it is reasonable to let the claim become the suitable object of the limitation of action, and it has been the common wisdom in the academic and legislative boundary. But we should make different treatments to different claims. The right of obligatory claim shall be included in the scope of limitation. The claim right on the personal right should not be suited to the limitation of action except for the damage compensation. And according to the current conditions of our country, it will do more good than harm if the petition rights on property don’t suit to the limitation of action.