摘要/Abstract

在生命权冲突的情况下，生命能否成为紧急避险的对象的争论由来已久。在非危险共同体的情况下，由于生命价值的至上性、无关第三人无义务容忍风险转嫁行为以及排除功利主义适用，笔者认为不能将生命作为紧急避险的对象。对于紧急状态下牺牲他人生命自救或牺牲少数人保全多数人生命的行为，刑法应持否定评价，必须处以刑罚，但应当减轻。

In all ages,the conflict of rights to life in the emergency situation is the focus of controversy among scholars.In the non-all-in-danger community, rights to life can not become the object of urgent danger prevention because the value of life is supreme,the third party has no obligation to tolerate risk shifting behavior and utilitarianism is ruled out.Sacrificing an unrelated person’s life to save other life or Sacrificing the lives of the unrelated minority to save the majority’s lives should be illegitimate.Different punishments should be given according to different acts and mitigation is based on the specific situation.