再论侵权行为法的相对独立
作者：王利明
摘要/Abstract
侵权行为法应当从债法体系中分离出来而成为民法体系中独立的一支。大陆法的债法体系虽然注重了各种债的关系的共性，但忽略了各种债的关系的个性。侵权损害赔偿责任不足以为各种侵权行为的受害人提供充分的救济，侵权法的一般条款不能取代大量的对具体侵权行为形态及责任的规定。对具体侵权行为形态及责任的详细规定有助于保障法官正当行使自由裁量权，有利于确定安排侵害物权的责任体系并维护民法内在体系的和谐，通过在侵权法中集中规定侵害权利的类型及责任有助于完善民事责任的救济体系,顺应两大法系融和的世界趋势，吸收英美法中的合理经验。
The tort law should be separated from the legal system of obligation and shall become an independent branch in the legal system of civil law. The continental law pays more attention to the commonness between all the kinds of obligations than the individuality between them. The liability of compensation for tort cannot provide abundant remedy for the different sufferer. The General Provision of tort law isn't able to replace the ones for a great number of specific torts and liability, which, if stipulated in detail, may do well to the judge's right of discretion and benefit for the inherent harmony of civil law system. The comparative independence of tort law also results from the trend of the harmonization between the continental law and the common law.
